Last updated: October 2010
Adriano Sanches
Melo
Assistant professor
Research Fellow CNPq - Level
2
Departamento de Ecologia, ICB, Universidade Federal de
Goiás
Caixa Postal 131, Goiânia, GO, 74001-970,
Brazil.
asm.adrimelo at gmail.com
Advisor professor at the Graduate program in Ecology and Evolution - UFG
Advisor professor at the Graduate program in Ecology - UFRGS
B.S.: Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual
de Campinas, Brazil, 1995
M.S.: Ecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas,
Brazil, 1998
Títle: "Macroinvertebrates associate to
stream stones: diversity patterns along a catchment"
Advisor:Prof. Dr. Claudio G. Froehlich
Ph.D: Ecology,
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil, 2002
Title: "Studies on species richness
estimators, experimental disturbances, and persistence of macroinvertebrate
stream communities during five years"
Advisor:Prof. Dr.
Claudio G. Froehlich
Teaching
UnderGrad students: Ecosystem Ecology (Portuguese only)
UnderGrad students: Bioestatistics (Portuguese only)
UnderGrad students: Philosophy of Science (Portuguese only)
Graduate students: Introduction to the Linear Models in Ecology (Portuguese only)
Graduate students: Writing Scientific Articles (Portuguese only)
Graduate students: Measuring diversity
(Portuguese only)
Graduate students: Introduction to statistical programming in R with
application in Ecology (Portuguese only)
Graduate students: Introduction to the use of the R environment in ecological
data analyses (Portuguese only)
Graduate students: Field Course in
Ecology
Research interest:
1-) Community Ecology
2-) Diversity of stream
macroinvertebrates
3-) Natural history
of aquatic insects, particularly Trichoptera and Megaloptera
4-) Methods on
species diversity analysis
Current students:
Carolina Ramos Caiado Gomes
Undergrad student (PIBIC-CNPq) , Universidade Federal de Goiás
Since: August 2010
Subject: Aggregation of insect in stream riffles: effects of the spatial position on species richness and community nestedness
Silvia Vendrusculo Milesi
Master in Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Since: March 2010
Subject:
Influence of the spatial position of small tributaries in the catchment
basin on the structure of stream insect communities
Fabiana Schneck (co-advisoring of Albano Schwarzbold)
Doctorate in Ecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
do Sul.
Since: March 2008
Subject: Effects of grazing,
velocity, fine sediments and substrate heterogeneity on the structure of
periphitic stream communities: an experimental approach
Luiz Ubiratan Hepp
Doctorate in Ecology, Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Since: March 2007
Subject: Spatial components of
aquatic insects diversity in streams.
Fabiana Gonçalves Barbosa
Doctorate in Ecology, Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Since: March 2007
Subject: Predictive modelling of exotic species
Previous students:
Pamela Flach (co-advisoring of Carla P. Ozorio).
Master in Ecology, Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Period: March 2007 - April 2009
Subject: Beta diversity of
meiofauna in coastal lagoons.
Fernanda da Silva Moreira
Undergrad student (PIBIC-CNPq), Universidade Federal do
Rio Grande do Sul
Period: August 2008 - July 2009
Assunto: Spatial autocorrelation in the composition of acari in coastal lagoons.
Marlon Castro Vasconcelos.
Master inEcology,
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Period: March 2005 - April 2007.
Subject: Impacts
resulting from the imput of terrestrial sediments in stream invertebrate
communities.
Victor Landeiro.
(Co-advisoring. Advisor: Dra. Neusa Hamada)
Master in Entomology,
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia.
Period: March 2004 –
February 2006.
Subject: Effects of
macroconsumers on the assemblage of stream insects and processing of leaves on
streams of Central Amazonia.
Francielle Bucker.
(with Dra Georgina Bond-Buckup)
Undergrad student. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Period: March 2005 –
June 2006.
Subject:
Microdistribution of two sympatric species of Aegla (Aeglidae:
Crustacea) is a stream site in southern Brazil.
Shirley Silva Costa.
Master in Ecology
and Evolution, Universidade Federal de Goiás.
Period: March 2004 –
April 2006.
Subject: Beta
diversity of stream invertebrates: among microhabitats and among sites
components.
Current projects:
1-) Community structure and persistence
of stream macroinvertebrates in tropical streams
2-) The
species of Megaloptera (Insecta) occurring in Estado de São Paulo, Brazil (with
Dr. Atilano Contreras-Ramos, Mexico)
3-) Experimental studies of natural and
antropic disturbance on stream invertebrates communities
4-) Beta diversity: effects of spatial
scales and environmental heterogeneity
Ecological
data analyses in the R statistical environment:
Since 2004 I have
adopted the free R statistical environment to analyze data and implement new
ecological analyses. The R environment is composed by hundreds of statistical
packages. Each package includes several functions to compute specific analyses.
A function is a set of sequential commands that operate on input data. For
instance, the package ‘vegan’ includes several functions to compute
multivariate (CA, CCA) and diversity analyses (species richness estimators,
diversity indices). The package ‘boot’ contains several functions related to
bootstrap analyses. Most of the work on R is done by typing command lines. The
mouse is only rarely used. Learning R is not so easy as others statistical
software available. You have to learn the commands. However, when you get some
familiarity with them all tasks are done very quickly. Most important, you will
be able to modify, adapt, extend or even create new functions easily. I am an R
enthusiastic and have used it for my own data analyses and teaching. Visit the
R project: http://www.r-project.org
Publications:
Ferro, V. G., I. R. Diniz e A. S. Melo. 2010. Diversity of Arctiidae (Insecta, Lepidoptera) in the Brazilian Cerrado: How much do we know? Zoologia.
Both,
C., S. Z. Cechin, A.
S. Melo e S. M. Hartz. 2010. What controls
tadpole richness and guild composition in ponds in subtropical
grasslands? Austral Ecology
31-) Pizo,
M. A. e A.
S. Melo. 2010. Attendance and co-occurrence of
birds following army antes in the Atlantic Rain Forest. The Condor 112: 571-578.
30-) Schneck,
F. e A.
S. Melo.
2010. Reliable sample sizes for
estimating similarity among macroinvertebrate
assemblages in tropical streams. Annales de Limnologie 46: 93:100.
29-) Landeiro, V. L., N. Hamada, B. S. Godoy e A. S. Melo. Effect of litter patch area on macroinvertebrate community, density of shredders, and leaf breakdown in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia 649: 355-363.
28-) Ligeiro, R., A. S. Melo e M. Callisto. 2010. Spatial scale and the diversity of macroinvertebrates in a Neotropical catchment. Freshwater Biology 55: 424-435.
27-)
Melo,
A. S.
2009. Explaining dissimilarities in macroinvertebrate assemblages among
stream sites using environmental variables. Zoologia
26:
79-84.
26-)
Barbosa, F. G. e A.
S. Melo.
2009. Modelo
preditivo de sobrevivência do mexilhão dourado (Limnoperna
fortunei)
em relação a variações de salinidade na Laguna dos Patos, RS,
Brasil. Biota Neotropica 9:
02809032009.
25-)
Diniz-Filho,
J. A. F., L. M. Bini, G. Oliveira, B. S. Barreto, M. M. F. P. Silva,
L. C. Terribile, T. F. L. V. B. Rangel, M. P. Pinto, N. P. R. Sousa,
L. C. G. Vieira, A.
S. Melo,
P. De Marco Jr., C. M. Vieira, D. Blamires, R. P. Bastos, P.
Carvalho, L. G. Ferreira, M. P. C. Telles, F. M. Rodrigues e T. N.
Soares. 2009. Macroecologia, biogeografia e áreas prioritárias para
conservação no Cerrado. 2009. Oecologia
Brasiliensis
13:
470-497.
24-)
Melo,
A. S.,
T.F.L.V.B. Rangel e J.A.F. Diniz-Filho. 2009. Environmental
drivers of beta-diversity patterns in New-World birds and mammals.
Ecography
32: 226-236.
Abstract
23-)
Melo,
A.S.
e T. A. Wheeler. 2009.
A new species of Pseudogaurax
Malloch
(Diptera: Chloropidae) reared from dobsonfly egg-masses (Megaloptera:
Corydalidae) in Brazil. Zootaxa
1972:53-58.
Abstract
22-)
Melo,
A. S.
e L. U. Hepp. 2008. Ferramentas
estatísticas para análises de dados provenientes de
biomonitoramento. Oecologia
Brasiliensis 12(3)
463-486.
Abstract
21-)
Melo,
A. S.
2008. O
que ganhamos ‘confundindo’ riqueza de espécies e equabilidade em
um índice de diversidade? Biota
Neotropica
8(3): 21-27.
Abstract
20-)
Vasconcelos, M.C. e A.
S. Melo.
2008. An
experimental test of the effects of inorganic sediment addition on
benthic macroinvertebrates of a subtropical stream. Hydrobiologia
610:
321-329.
Abstract
19-)
Landeiro, V. L., N. Hamada e A.
S. Melo.
2008. Responses
of aquatic invertebrate assemblages and leaf breakdown to
macroconsumer exclusion in Amazonian “terra firme” streams.
Fundamental
and Applied Limnology
172: 49-58.
Abstract
18-)
Bücker, F., R. Gonçalves,
G.
Bond-Buckup e
A.
S. Melo.
2008. Effect of environmental variables on the distribution of two
freshwater crabs (Anomura: Aeglidae). Journal
of Crustacean Biology
28:248-251.
Abstract
17-)
Costa S. S. e A.
S. Melo.
2008. Beta diversity in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages:
among-site and among-microhabitat components. Hydrobiologia
598:131-138.
Abstract
16-)
Melo,
A. S.,
G. Bond-Buckup, L. Buckup, D. S. Castiglioni e A. A. P. Bueno. 2008.
Invertebrados Aquáticos. In: G. Bond-Buckup. (Org.). Livro de
Atividades (Biodiversidade dos Campos de Cima da Serra). Porto
Alegre: Libretos.
15-)
Melo,
A. S.,
G. Bond-Buckup, L. Buckup, D. S. Castiglioni e A. A. P. Bueno. 2008.
Invertebrados Aquáticos. In: G. Bond-Buckup. (Org.). Biodiversidade
dos Campos de Cima da Serra. Porto Alegre: Libreto, p. 58-77.
14-)
Melo,
A. S.,
L. M. Bini
e S. M. Thomaz. 2007.
Assessment of
methods
to estimate aquatic macrophyte species richness in extrapolated
sample sizes. Aquatic
Botany 86:377-384.
Abstract
13-)
Melo, A. S.,
L. M. Bini e P. Carvalho. 2006.
Brazilian articles in international journal on Limnology.
Scientometrics
67:
187-199.
Abstract
12-)
Melo, A. S.
2005. Effects of taxonomic and numeric resolution on the ability to
detect ecological patterns at local scale using stream
macroinvertebrates. Archiv
fur Hydrobiologie
164: 309-323.
Abstract
11-)
Melo, A. S.
e C. G. Froehlich. 2004. Substrate stability in streams:effects of
stream size, particle size, and rainfall on frequency of movement and
burial of particles. Acta
Limnologica Brasiliensia 16:
381-390.
Abstract
10-)
Melo, A. S.
2004. A
critic of the use of jackknife and related non-parametric techniques
to estimate species richness in assemblages. Community
Ecology 5:
149-157.
Abstract
9-)
Melo, A. S.
e C. G. Froehlich. 2004.
Colonization by macroinvertebrates of experimentally disturbed stones
in three tropical streams differing in size. International
Review of Hydrobiology
89:317-325.
Abstract
8-)
Melo, A. S.,
D. K. Niyogi, C. D. Matthaei e C. R. Townsend. 2003. Resistance,
resilience and patchiness of invertebrate assemblages in native
tussock and pasture streams in New Zealand after a hydrological
disturbance. Canadian
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
60: 731-739.
Abstract
e fotos do trabalho de campo
7-) Melo, A. S. 2003. Diversidade de macroinvertebrados em riachos. in Métodos de Estudos em Biologia da Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre. Cullen, L. Jr., R. Rudran e C. V. Padua (eds). Editora da UFPR. Curitiba.
6-)
Melo, A. S.,
R. A. S. Pereira, A. J. Santos, G. J. Shepherd, G. Machado, H. F.
Medeiros e R. J. Sawaya. 2003.
Comparing species richness among assemblages using sample units: why
not use extrapolation methods to compare species richness? Oikos
101:
398-410.
Abstract,
função para calcular estimadores nb e ls e arquivo .pdf
5-)
Melo, A. S.
e C. G. Froehlich. 2001.
Macroinvertebrates in neotropical streams: richness patterns along a
catchment and assemblage structure between 2 seasons. Journal
of the North American Benthological Society
20:1-16.
Abstract
4-)
Melo, A. S.
e C. G. Froehlich. 2001. Evaluation of methods for estimating
macroinvertebrate species richness using individual stones in
tropical streams. Freshwater
Biology
46:711-721.
Abstract
3-)
Melo, A. S.
e C. F. S. Andrade. 2001. Differential predation of the planarian
Dugesia
tigrina
on two mosquito
species under laboratory conditions. Journal
of American Mosquito Control Association
17: 81-83.
Abstract
2-)
Melo, A.S.,
A. C. C. Macedo e C. F. S. Andrade. 1996. Eficiência de Dugesia
tigrina
(Girard) (Turbellaria:Tricladida) como agente controlador de
imaturos do mosquito Aedes
albopictus
(Skuse) em pneus-armadilha. Anais
da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil
25: 321-327.
Abstract
1-)
Melo, A. S.,
S. M. Recco-Pimentel & A. A. Giaretta. 1995. The karyotype of the
stream dwelling Megaelosia
massarti
(Anura, Leptodactylidae, Hylodinae). Cytologia
60:
49-52.
Abstract
Bücker, F., R. Gonçalves, G. Bond-Buckup e
A. S. Melo. 2008. Effect of environmental variables on the
distribution of two freshwater crabs (Anomura: Aeglidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 28:248-251.
Abstract--We evaluate whether the abundance of the freshwater crabs Aegla itacolomiensis and A. platensis is related to any or all of 11 environmental variables. We sampled 205 Surber samples (33333 cm) in a stream five meters wide in southern Brazil. For each Surber sample we obtained measures of flow velocity, depth, type of substrate, and availability of coarse particulate organic matter. The relationships between abundances of the two species and the environmental variables were assessed by regression trees. Only 2 of the 11 environmental variables were important in describing the abundances of the two species, both of them related to availability of coarse particulate organic matter. The abundance of Aegla itacolomiensis was related positively to quantity of fragmented leaves and, to a lesser degree, to quantity of twigs. For the abundance of A. platensis, quantity of twigs, followed by fragmented leaves, were the most important environmental factors. The quantity of recently fallen, unfragmented leaves was unimportant. We conclude that the two species of Aegla select locations with abundant old plant fragments that are usually colonized by fungi and bacteria. This conclusion is corroborated by previous studies indicating that Aegla spp. feed mostly on plant fragments.
Melo, A. S., L. M. Bini e P. Carvalho. 2005. Brazilian articles in international
journal on Limnology. Scientometrics 67: 187-199.
Abstract --We assessed the contribution of Brazilian limnologists (freshwater
ecologists) in international journals in the period 1970-2004. Brazilian
contribution was low and regular in the 1970’s, but increased steeply after
1980 with no signs of stabilization until the present. Articles authored by
Brazilians tend to be less cited than articles authored by non-Brazilians,
although this difference is reduced in co-authored articles with international
researchers. Brazilian articles
are not distributed homogenously among the sub-areas of Limnology, but present
some biases that can be explained by intellectual legacy. Brazil has invested
since the 1970’s in establishing postgraduate courses in Brazil and in the last
years has turned the focus to a better qualification of these courses. We
believe these are the main reasons for the conspicuous development of Brazilian
Limnology.
Melo, A. S., L. M. Bini e S. M. Thomaz. 2007. Assessment of methods to
estimate aquatic macrophyte species richness in extrapolated sample sizes. Aquatic
Botany 86:377-384.
Abstract -- We evaluated six methods to estimate species richness in extrapolated sample size using presence–absence data for aquatic macrophyte assemblages. Methods suitable for assemblages involving terrestrial and non-clonal (unitary) organisms may not be valid for aquatic macrophytes. The extrapolation of a species accumulation curve using a logarithmic function or using a linear model on the log of accumulated sampling units consistently overestimated species richness. The newly proposed Total-Species method gave similar results. The Negative Binomial and Logarithmic Series methods and the recently proposed Binomial Mixture Model were unbiased and accurate. We conclude that current extrapolation techniques are valid for estimation of species richness in macrophyte assemblages, and recommend the Logarithmic Series, Binomial Negative or Binomial Mixture Model methods.
Costa S. S. e A.
S. Melo. 2008.Beta diversity in stream macroinvertebrate
assemblages: among-site and among-microhabitat components. Hydrobiologia
598:131-138.
Abstract --The benthic macroinvertebrate community is
an important component of stream diversity, because its members are fundamental
connectors among the different trophic levels of running waters. In this study,
we assessed alpha and beta diversities of benthic macroinvertebrates in three
stream sites and four microhabitats: (i) moss in the air-water interface; (ii)
submerged roots of terrestrial plants; (iii) leaf litter deposited in pools;
(iv) stones in riffles. We constructed rarefaction curves and compared species
richness among microhabitats for each stream site. Additionally, we evaluated
which factor, stream site, or microhabitat, was most important in determining
variation in assemblage structure, i.e., beta diversity. There was no
significant difference among microhabitats in terms of taxa richness evaluated
by rarefaction curves. Using partial Constrained Correspondence Analysis
(pCCA), we found that microhabitat was most important in determining community
composition, accounting for 42.02% of the total variation. Stream sites
accounted for 22.27%. In accordance with the pCCA, exploratory multivariate
methods (ordination and classification) revealed four distinct groups,
corresponding to the four microhabitats, independent of stream sites. Our
results indicated that differences among environmental conditions are much more
important in the determination of stream assemblage structure than are
differences in spatial location. Accordingly, adjacent microhabitats in a
single stream site harbor macroinvertebrate assemblages more dissimilar than
those found in a single microhabitat at different stream sites.
Melo, A. S. Em preparação. Is it possible to improve recovery of
field-defined groups by weighting rare species in similarity indices?
Abstract
--Similarity indices differ in a number of ways, one of them being relative
weight given to rare species. Heavyweight of rare species may be justified in
terms of sampling. An index applied to two identical communities may
erroneously produce low similarity if communities are composed of many rare
species and the sampling is not extensive enough to observe all them in both
samples. Heavyweight of rare species are thought to correct such negative bias.
I evaluated three indices that heavyweight rare species, the recently proposed
Sørensen-Chao, Goodall’s, and NNESS. Indices were evaluated in their abilities
to distinguish field-defined groups. Results were contrasted against two
wide-used indices, Bray-Curtis and Morisita-Horn, and one recently proposed,
Sørensen-Abundance. Goodall’s and Sørensen-Chao performed badly. On the other
hand, NNESS was good in the recover of groups, with similar or even superior
performance than the traditional indices, being a good candidate for future
ecological studies.
Melo, A. S., L. M. Bini e P. Carvalho. 2005. Brazilian
articles in international journal on Limnology. Scientometrics in press
Abstract
--We assessed the contribution of Brazilian limnologists (freshwater
ecologists) in international journals in the period 1970-2004. Brazilian
contribution was low and regular in the 1970’s, but increased steeply after
1980 with no signs of stabilization until the present. Articles authored by
Brazilians tend to be less cited than articles authored by non-Brazilians,
although this difference is reduced in co-authored articles with international
researchers. Brazilian articles
are not distributed homogenously among the sub-areas of Limnology, but present
some biases that can be explained by intellectual legacy. Brazil has invested
since the 1970’s in establishing postgraduate courses in Brazil and in the last
years has turned the focus to a better qualification of these courses. We
believe these are the main reasons for the conspicuous development of Brazilian
Limnology.
Melo, A. S. 2005. Effects of taxonomic and numeric resolution on the ability to detect ecological
patterns at local scale using stream macroinvertebrates. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 164: 309-323.
Abstract --The increasing demand for methods of rapid
stream bioassessment has stimulated the evaluation of data simplification. In
particular, these studies have assessed how much power is lost when
species/morphospecies identification is replaced by family identifications or
use of EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) taxa only. A second
simplifying factor commonly evaluated is the use of presence/absence data instead
of density. These simplifications have provided valid results in most cases
where differences among groups are large, particularly in studies comparing
impacted vs. non-impacted stream sites and ecological studies involving large
spatial scales. Here I evaluate whether data simplification, both in terms of
taxonomic (families, morphospecies of EPT) and numeric (presence/absence)
resolutions, is valid for ecological studies done at local scales, where
differences among groups are subtle. Datasets used are derived from a five-year
study of five stream sites situated in a catchment in southeast Brazil. Streams
were sampled twice a year, in the rainy (summer) and dry (winter) seasons. I
used Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) to evaluate if differences i) among stream
sites and ii) between seasons within a stream site, revealed by using the full
data set (morphospecies, quantitative data), were also detected when using the
simplified datasets. The effect of taxonomic resolution was not significant;
the two simplified levels of this factor (morphospecies of EPT, families) were
able to recover the same groups revealed by the full dataset. However, the use
of presence/absence data had a strong negative effect on the ability to
distinguish groups, particularly when differences were small (between seasons
within a stream site). The success in recovering groups using simplified
taxonomic data agrees with previous evaluations done using datasets from
applied fields and those from ecological studies involving large spatial
scales. However, in contrast to results observed in applied and large-scale
studies, use of simplified data quantification in local datasets resulted in
significant loss of information. I suggest that the use of family
identifications or morphospecies of EPT are reliable alternatives to the use of
species/morphospecies in ecological studies at a local scale.
Melo, A. S., R. A. S. Pereira, A. J. Santos, G. J.
Shepherd, G. Machado, H. F. Medeiros and R. J. Sawaya. 2003. Comparing species richness among
assemblages using sample units: why not use extrapolation methods to compare
species richness? Oikos 101: 398-410.
Abstract--Comparisons of species
richness among assemblages using different sample sizes may produce erroneous
conclusions due to the strong positive relationship between richness and sample
size. A current way of handling the problem is to standardize sample sizes to
the size of the smallest sample in the study. A major criticism about this
approach is the loss of information contained in the larger samples. A
potential way of solving the problem is to apply extrapolation techniques to
smaller samples, and produce an estimated species richness expected to occur if
sample size were increased to the same size of the largest sample. We evaluated
the reliability of 11 potential extrapolation methods over a range of different
data sets and magnitudes of extrapolation. The basic approach adopted in the
evaluation process was a comparison between the observed richness in a sample
and the estimated richness produced by estimators using a subsample of the same
sample. The Log-Series estimator was the most robust for the range of data sets
and subsample sizes used, followed closely by Negative Binomial, SO-J1, Logarithmic,
Stout and Vandermeer, and Weibull estimators. When applied to a set of
independently replicated samples from a species-rich assemblage, 95% confidence
intervals of estimates produced by the six best evaluated methods were
comparable to those of observed richness in the samples. Performance of
estimators tended to be better for species-rich data sets rather than for those
which contained few species. Good estimates were found when extrapolating up to
1.8-2.0 times the size of the sample. We suggest that the use of the best
evaluated methods within the range of indicated conditions provides a safe
solution to the problem of losing information when standardizing different
sample sizes to the size of the smallest sample.
article .pdf (there is an errata in the last page)
(~650Kb)
Executable compressed file (bn_ls_V_1_1.exe) (~70Kb) containing:
1) Text file (.txt) of the function nb.ls (v. 1.1) to
calculate the estimators Negative Binomial and Log-Serie described in the
article cited above;
2) Text file (.rtf) with instructions on how to
install the function and run it in the R statistical package;
3) Data file (.txt) on stream invertebrates. Example
of input data.
Melo, A. S. and C. G. Froehlich. 2001a.
Macroinvertebrates in neotropical streams: richness patterns along a catchment and
assemblage structure between 2 seasons. Journal of the North American
Benthological Society 20:1-16.
Abstract—We investigated
macroinvertebrate richness in 10 streams of different sizes within the Carmo
River catchment in Brazil. Specifically, we tested 2 predictions of the river
continuum concept (RCC): 1) within the catchment, mid-sized streams (orders
3–4) have the richest biota, and 2) macroinvertebrate assemblage structure is
more stable during the dry season than during the rainy season when natural
spates are frequent. We sampled the streams using individual stones as sampling
units. Observed and estimated values of richness did not follow the hump-shaped
pattern of richness along a gradient of stream size as predicted by the RCC;
the richest streams were smaller than those predicted. No difference in
assemblage structure between seasons was found on the basis of observed and
estimated richness or abundance. The similarity in assemblage structure between
the rainy and dry seasons was also supported by multivariate analysis. Observed
richness and species composition (reflected in multivariate analysis) were
strongly correlated to stream size and the presence of fine sediments over
rocks. Assemblage structure in these streams seems to be deterministic, in that
richness and species composition are related to physical habitat
characteristics.
Melo, A. S. and C. G. Froehlich. 2001b. Evaluation of
methods for estimating macroinvertebrate species richness using individual
stones in tropical streams. Freshwater Biology 46:711-721.
1. The most straightforward way to
assess diversity in a site is the species count. However, a relatively large
sample is needed for a reliable result because of the presence of many rare
species in rich assemblages. The use of richness estimation methods is
suggested by many authors as a solution for this problem in many cases.
2. We examined the performance of
13 methods for estimating richness of stream macroinvertebrates inhabiting
riffles both at local (stream) and regional (catchment) scales. The evaluation
was based on (1) the smallest sub-sample size needed to estimate total richness
in the sample, (2) constancy of this size, (3) lack of erratic behaviour in
curve shape and (4) similarity in curve shape through different data sets.
Samples were from three single stream sites (local) and three from several
streams within the same catchment basin (regional). All collections were made
from protected forest areas in south-east Brazil.
3. All estimation methods were
dependent on sub-sample size, producing higher estimates when using larger
sub-sample sizes. The Stout and Vandermeer method estimated total richness in
the samples with the smallest sub-sample size, but showed some erratic
behaviour at small sub-sample sizes, and the estimated curves were not similar
among the six samples. The Bootstrap method was the best estimator in relation
to constancy of sub-sample sizes, but needed an unacceptably large sub-sample
to estimate total richness in the samples. The second order Jackknife method
was the second best estimator both for minimum sub-sample size and constancy of
this size and we suggest its use in future studies of diversity in tropical
streams. Despite the inferior performance of several other methods, some
produced acceptable results. Comments are made on the utility of using these
estimators for predicting species richness in an area and for comparative
purposes in diversity studies.
Melo, A. S. and C. F. S. Andrade. 2001c.
Differential predation of the planarian Dugesia tigrina on two mosquito
species under laboratory conditions. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association
17: 81-83.
Abstract. Two experiments were
performed on the predation of the planarian Dugesia tigrina (Girard) upon 2
mosquito prey species, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus. Bioassays
were carried out in sectioned tires with 2 liters of water. In the Ist
experiment, predation was evaluated using 4, 8, and 12 mature planarians
against 40 2nd-stage larvae of each mosquito species alone. In the 2nd
experiment, the same 3 predator densities were used with a pool composed of 20
2nd-stage larvae of each mosquito species. In the Ist experiment, final
corrected mortality of Ae. albopictus reached 89.1, 98.8, and 99.6% and final
corrected mortality of Cx. quinquefasciatus reached 29.4, 48.0, and 53.0%,
respectively, with 4, 8, and 12 planarians. In the 2nd experiment and when
subjected to the: density of 4 planarians, Ae. albopictus was more susceptible
to predation, with a selectivity index of 0.87, whereas this index was 0.13 for
Cx. quinquefasciatus. Predation was more intensive during the Ist 4 days of the
experiments, when most larvae were in the 2nd and 3rd stages. We observed that
Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae were faster than Ae. albopictus in reacting to
planarian contacts, resulting in more success in escaping from the predator
attacks.
Melo, A.S., A. C. C. Macedo and C. F. S. Andrade.
1996. Eficiência de Dugesia tigrina (Girard)
(Turbellaria:Tricladida) como agente controlador de imaturos do mosquito Aedes
albopictus (Skuse) em pneus-armadilha. Anais da Sociedade
Entomológica do Brasil 25: 321-327. (In Portuguese).
Natural colonization of mosquitoes
was weekly evaluated in trap-tires inoculated with the planaria Dugesia tigrina
(Girard) as predator. Ten pairs of tires (with or without planaria) were set up
in an area of 245 ha at the Universidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMP. Four
individuals/tire were introduced. Pupal and larval populations were evaluated
weekly for a period up to 15 weeks, as well as the populational growth of
planaria in the traps. Aedes albopictus (Skuse) larvae and pupae represented
99.5% of the total trapped, the 2nd and 3rd instars being less frequent in
tires with predators when compared to tires without predators. Efficiency in
controlling mosquitoes was in average >90%. Planaria showed sexual
reproduction reaching as many as 73 individuals/trap.
Melo, A. S., S. M. Recco-Pimentel and A. A. Giaretta. 1995. The karyotype of the
stream dwelling Megaelosia massarti (Anura, Leptodactylidae,
Hylodinae). Cytologia 60: 49-52.
Leptodactylids are a large and
diversified family of Neotropical anurans with about sixty genera and 710
species. The subfamily Hylodinae is mainly related to rushing, clean, cold
water virulents of the Atlantic Forest in Southeast Brazil; Megaelosia and
Hylodes are endemic genera of this vegetal formation. The subfamily is composed
of three genera, nominally: Hylodes (14 spp.), Crossodactylus (5 spp.) and
Megaelosia (4 spp.). The hylodine frogs form a monophyletic group in which Hylodes
and Crossodatylus are more related to one another than with Megaelosia.
Megaelosia species are very different by their large size and aquatic
frog-eating habits. They are also particularly rare in collections, probably
due to their restricted distribution and cryptic behavior. Karyological
information is currently available for five species of the genus Hylodes and
three of the genus Crossodactylus. The most widespread diploid number among the
subfamily, as well as the family, is 2n = 26. Here, we describe the karyotype
of Megaelosia massarti, a first karyological report on the genus.
Melo, A. S. e C. G.
Froehlich. 2004. Substrate stability in streams:effects of stream
size, particle size, and rainfall on frequency of movement and burial of
particles. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 16: 381-390.
Abstract--Surface movement and burial of streambed particles are
indicated in the literature as mechanisms by which floods disturb stream
invertebrate assemblages. We designed an experiment to test whether stream
size, rainfall, and particle size were important in the frequency of particle
movement and burial. Five stream sites, from orders 1-4 and differing from each
other in relation to substrate composition and presence of debris dams were
studied. Labeled particles were placed in the streambed and checked every two
months during one year. There was a statistically significant interaction among
rainfall and particle size, indicating that the positive effect of rainfall was
dependent on particle size. Also, there was a statistically significant
positive effect of stream size, although of low magnitude when compared to the
effects of rainfall. Frequency of burial was much lower than that of particle
movements, except in the smallest stream site during the peak of the rainy
season when 57% of the particles were buried to some degree. During periods of
high rainfall several of the debris dams present in the smallest stream were
broken, causing movements of particles located upstream and burial of particles
in downstream areas. In a second survey one year after the end of the
experiment, 67-100% of the particles were dislodged.
Melo, A. S. and C. G. Froehlich. 2004. Colonization
by macroinvertebrates of experimentally disturbed stones in three tropical
streams differing in size. International Review of Hydrobiology
89:317-325.
Abstract--We experimentally
disturbed stones in three contrasting streams and followed the colonization
process during 64 days. The three streams were 0.5-1, 10 and 20 m wide. The
smallest stream had a small discharge and the studied area was close to its
source. The biggest stream held a diversified assemblage of fishes, including
benthonic and nektonic insectivorous species. The medium-sized stream site was
far from the source and the fish assemblage was composed mainly of
detritivorous armored catfish. We hypothesized that colonization of new patches
both in the smallest and the biggest streams would be slower than in the
medium-sized stream. In the smallest, the small area upstream could restrict
the number of potential colonizers, especially those dispersed by drift.
Presence of predaceous fishes in the biggest site would inhibit drift
behaviour. In other hand, the medium-sized stream would not be constrained by
the two factors. We assessed data on abundance, species richness and similarity
of samples collected 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 days after the start of the experiment.
Colonization patterns for the streams were quite similar to each other, causing
the rejection of the stated hypothesis. Colonization was fast, and for the
smallest and the medium-sized streams, undisturbed control levels of abundance
and species richness were attained in 8-16 days. Recovery of species richness
in the biggest stream was similar to the two other streams. However, abundance
in the biggest stream increased continually until the end of the experiment,
attaining values similar to control samples in day 4 and values significantly
higher than those observed in the control sample after day 32. Similarity among
colonization days and controls increased until day 16, when curves tended to
flatten off at values lower than those observed between control samples.
Recovery in the studied streams was fast, and agrees with results from other
studies. Lack of support to the original hypothesis is discussed in terms of
the validity of the stated assumptions and more generally in relation to the
relative importance of drift in colonization of small patches.
Melo, A. S. 2004 A critic of the use of jackknife
and related non-parametric techniques to estimate species richness in
assemblages. Community Ecology 5: 149-157. pdf article .
Abstract--Species richness in an
assemblage is frequently used as a measure of biological diversity. However, observed
species richness is strongly dependent on sample size. If more samples are
collected, then more species are observed. Non-parametric species richness
estimators, such as the Jackknife 1 and 2 and the Chao 1 and 2, are indicated
in the literature as potential solutions to the problem of dependence of
observed species richness on sampling effort. These methods are intended to
estimate the total species richness in an area or assemblage with small
sampling effort. Non-parametric estimators are based on the number of species
observed, and the number of rare species in a sample, i.e., that occurred in
one and/or two sampling units, or with one and/or two individuals. High
estimates are produced when samples contain large proportions of rare species.
Using a range of real data sets, I show that estimates produced by
non-parametric methods are generally dependent on observed species richness. An
implicit assumption of these non-parametric techniques is that the rare species
curve should present high values at small sample sizes and decreasing values as
sampling effort is increased. This assumption was observed in only one out of
eight datasets presented. Instead, the rare species curve generally flattens
off around a constant value as sampling effort increases. I conclude that
non-parametric estimators are not reliable to estimate species richness in an
assemblage when the rare species curve do not show a decreasing trend. Comments
are made on the possibilities of using non-parametric estimators in the comparisons
of species assemblages.
Melo, A. S. and C. G. Froehlich. In preparation.
Community structure and persistence of stream macroinvertebrates in tropical
streams.
Abstract--We used
data of stream macroinvertebrates in five streams sampled twice a year during
five years to assess four topics related to persistence of communities: (1) Are
there distinct and recurrent summer and winter communities? (2) Does
communities in seasons of low environmental variability (dry, winter season)
are more constant and similar to each other over years than are communities in
seasons of high environmental variability (rainy, summer season)? (3) Does
community variability is related to environmental variability? (4) Does
community variability increases with time? Communities in each stream site were
distinct from each other as revealed by UPGMA analysis. For the five streams,
all 10 samples collected in each stream over five years were classified in a
single group. Winter samples tended to cluster together at high similarity
levels and nested within summer samples. We used Kendall's coefficient of
concordance (W) to assess persistence of summer and winter communities over the
five years period studied. For the five streams, persistence was higher in
winter than in summer communities. Persistence was not related to environmental
stability of the five streams studied. There was not an overall significance of
the correlations between persistence of communities (measured by the
coefficients of concordance W), and three measures of site stability (frequency
of dislocated and buried stones and the scores of the Pfankuch index of channel
stability). Variability of winter communities did not increased with time.
Concordance between winter samples collected in adjacent years was not
different from concordance between samples collected far apart. However,
concordance between summer communities decreased as samples were farther apart.
Results support the view that stream communities vary along the year from a
non-equilibrium state during the wet season when disturbance by high flow is
frequent, to an equilibrium state during the dry season when flow is stable.
Landeiro, V. L., N. Hamada
& A. S. Melo. 2008. Responses of aquatic invertebrate assemblages and leaf
breakdown to macroconsumer exclusion in Amazonian “terra firme” streams. Fundamental
and Applied Limnology 172: 49-58.
Abstract: Many authors have reported a lack of insect shredders
in tropical streams and some have suggested that macroconsumers, such as fi sh
and shrimp, are potential substitutes for insect shredders. We experimentally
excluded macroconsumers (fi sh and shrimp) from leaf packs to examine their
role in determining the rate of leaf breakdown and their effects on the
associated invertebrate community. The experiment was designed in blocks and
replicated in two reaches of four streams. Temperature of all stream reaches
studied was 24 °C (without variation), and water conductivity was low, varying
from 8.8 to 10.8 μs/cm.
Fish were never observed near the leaf packs and therefore the effects of the
macroconsumer treatment were attributed to shrimps. We found a signifi cant effect
on leaf breakdown, with greater leaf breakdown (i.e., less mass remaining after
17 days) in the control (65 % leaf mass remaining) compared to the
macroconsumer exclusion (70 % leaf mass remaining). However, the mechanism for
this effect was not clear. Considerable variation in leaf decomposition
occurred among blocked stream sites, suggesting that some factors differing
among these sites, perhaps macroinvertebrate shredder abundance, was
contributing to decomposition. Leaves were visually inspected at the conclusion
of the experiment and there was no sign of shrimp directly feeding on the
leaves. There was no difference in insect shredder abundance between
treatments. There was, however, a signifi cantly greater amount of non-mining
chironomids in the absence of macroconsumers. This is probably due to the
release from predation by shrimp.
Vasconcelos, M.C. & A.
S. Melo. 2008. An experimental test of the effects of inorganic sediment
addition on benthic macroinvertebrates of a subtropical stream. Hydrobiologia
610: 321-329.
Abstract --Inorganic sediments of
terrestrial origin may impact stream macroinvertebrate communities. Although
input of terrestrial sediments to streams may occur naturally, human-induced activities in the catchment amplify this input greatly. We used an
instream experiment to investigate whether short-term additions of terrestrial
sediments of two size classes affected stream macroinvertebrates. The
experiment was designed in blocks to minimize the influence of flow velocity
and other environmental variables. Four treatments were employed: (i) addition
of fine sand (0–0.24 mm), (ii) coarse sand (0.25–0.8 mm), (iii) fine+coarse
sand, and (iv) control (water only). Macroinvertebrates were sampled
immediately after the addition of sediments (or water). The experiment
consisted of 20 blocks. We analyzed the response of the macroinvertebrate fauna
in terms of abundance and species richness. Since species richness is strongly
dependent on number of individuals sampled, we also analyzed rarefied species
richness. Community structure was evaluated using a distancebased Manova on
presence/absence and abundance data. The addition of coarse and fine+coarse
sand reduced the abundance and species richness of macroinvertebrates in relation
to the control. The response in terms of rarefied species richness in the
treatments did not differ from the control, indicating that reduction in
species richness was a sampling artifact resulting from decreased sample
abundance. The Manova analyses indicated that coarse-sand addition caused
changes in both species composition and community structure. Addition of fine
and fine+coarse sand affected only slightly species composition and community
structure. We concluded that even short-term input of terrestrial sediments
causes impacts on benthic macroinvertebrates, and recommend that land-use
management of tropical catchments should employ practices that reduce input of
terrestrial sediments to streams.
Melo, A. S., T.F.L.V.B. Rangel & J.A.F. Diniz-Filho. 2008.
Environmental drivers of beta-diversity patterns in New-World birds and
mammals. Ecography 31: ppp-ppp.
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/121475360/PDFSTART
Abstract -- Current
macroecological research places great emphasis on patterns of species richness
(alpha diversity) and the underlying ecological and evolutionary processes
involved in their origin and maintenance. However, few studies dealing with
continental scales have addressed dissimilarities in species composition among
areas (beta diversity). Using data for the occurrence of 3836 bird and 1641
mammal species in 4220 cells covering the New World, we assessed whether broad-scale
macroecological patterns in beta diversity are related to dissimilarities in
environmental variables and biotic units. We employed spatial regression and
tree regression to model beta diversity. Difference in altitude was the best
predictor of beta diversity. Accordingly, the highest beta diversity values
were found in mountainous areas, particularly in the Andes, Central America and
western North America. Explanatory variables related to transitions between
biotic units (biome, ecoregion) were relatively unimportant. Areas that differ
in altitude from their surroundings harbor different sets of species, and this
may reflect either species adaptation to particular environmental conditions by
range shifts, or species divergence by vicariance, or both.
Melo, A. S. 2008. O que ganhamos ‘confundindo’ riqueza de espécies e
equabilidade em um índice de diversidade? Biota Neotropica
8(3): 21-27.
http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v8n3/pt/download?point-of-view+bn00108032008+item
Abstract --In
Community Ecology and in many applications of Conservation Biology, diversity
means variety of species, which may or not include information on the relative
importance of each species. Diversity is one of the most important attributes
in the study of communities and, as a result, many methods are available to its
measurement. Among them, non-parametric diversity (or heterogeneity) indices
such as Shannon and Simpson formulae are widely employed in a range of studies.
These indices are composed of (or confound) two components, species richness
and evenness. Different indices can be obtained combining the two components
with different weights. The lack of an objective criteria to guide appropriate
weighting of each component results in an arbitrary decision to use an index
and not another. Additionally, depending on the weight the indices give to each
component, an index may indicate that community A is more diversified than
community B while a second index may indicate the contrary. Also, diversity
indices applied to samples differing in species richness and evenness may
produce similar values. Such problems can be avoided using alternative methods.
One of them is diversity profile, which includes not one index but many
diversity indices differing in the weight given to each component. Additional
alternatives include the use of species richness only, Whittaker’s diagram (or
of dominance) and scatter diagrams with axes defined by species richness and an
evenness index. Except by species richness, the cited alternative methods show
graphically much more information than that contained in a single value
produced by a diversity index. In studies requiring a response variable to be
modeled in relation to predictor variables (Linear Models such as Regression
and Analysis of Variance), I suggest the separate use of species richness and
evenness as each one may reflect different aspect of communities.
Melo, A. S. & L. U. Hepp. 2008. Ferramentas
estatísticas para análises de dados provenientes de biomonitoramento. Oecologia Brasiliensis 12(3) 463-486.
Abstract -- Apart from multimetric
indices and predictive models, there are statistical methods that can be
employed in biomonitoring or bioassessment studies. In this revision we
emphasized the need for planning researches beforehand and discussed issues to
this regard: clear defi nition of objectives, correct making of replications,
simplification of data sets (through using genus/family, binary
presence/absence results, ignoring uncommon species), standardization of
sampling procedures, transformation and standardization of data. Moreover, we
presented a brief overview of univariate and multivariate statistical analyses,
based on the identifi cation of traits of variables, like number, type (if
response or predictor variable) and nature (categorical or quantitative
variables). During the description of univariate analyses, we presented
examples of the use of blocks and covariates and highlight the relevance of
interacting explanatory variables. In the multivariate analyses, we considered
the objectives and logics driving ordination and classifi cation analyses and
distance-based MANOVA.
Melo, A.S. & T. A. Wheeler. A new species of Pseudogaurax
Malloch (Diptera: Chloropidae) reared from dobsonfly egg-masses
(Megaloptera: Corydalidae) in Brazil. Zootaxa no prelo.
Abstract
-- Pseudogaurax idiogenes Wheeler sp. n.
(type locality: Iporanga, São Paulo, Brazil) is described from specimens reared
from the egg masses of dobsonflies (Corydalidae) in southern Brazil. This is
only the second record of Pseudogaurax
larvae feeding on Megaloptera eggs (first from the Neotropical region). Larvae
of most species of Pseudogaurax are
predators of spider eggs.